Salespeople, entrepreneurs, and corporate leaders spend hours refining their scripts and slide decks. They practice their vocal delivery and select their attire with precision. Yet, one aspect of their presentation often goes unplanned: what they do with their hands. While it is common to see professionals moving their hands while speaking, the actual impact of these movements on business outcomes has remained largely unknown.
A new study published in the Journal of Marketing Research investigates this overlooked element of communication. The research suggests that hand movements are not merely nervous tics or theatrical flourishes. When used in specific ways, they can significantly alter how an audience perceives a speaker and their message. The findings indicate that the right gestures can boost an audience’s willingness to listen and even their intent to purchase a product.
The Challenge of Measuring Movement
For years, marketing researchers focused primarily on what speakers said or how their faces looked. Analyzing text is relatively straightforward with modern software, and facial analysis tools have existed for some time. However, measuring hand movements presented a significant technical hurdle. It is difficult to quantify hand gestures objectively on a large scale.
Giovanni Luca Cascio Rizzo of the University of Southern California led a team to solve this measurement problem. He worked alongside Jonah Berger from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and Mi Zhou from the University of British Columbia. The researchers aimed to bridge the gap between verbal and nonverbal communication analysis.
To understand the effects of gestures, the team needed to look beyond simple observation. They needed to measure the frequency, type, and context of movements across thousands of hours of video. This required a method that could see the hands and understand how those movements related to the spoken words.
Tracking Hands with Technology
The researchers began their investigation with a massive dataset: 2,184 TED Talks. These videos provided a standardized format with speakers standing on a stage, allowing for consistent measurement. To analyze the footage, the team employed automated video analysis.
They utilized a tool called MediaPipe, which detects specific key points on a human hand, such as knuckles and fingertips. By tracking the position of these points frame by frame, the researchers calculated the spatial distance the hands moved over time. This provided a raw measure of how active a speaker’s hands were during their presentation.
However, raw movement was not enough. The team needed to categorize what the hands were actually doing. They used a Large Multimodal Model (LMM), specifically Google’s Gemini, to analyze the videos. This artificial intelligence processed both the visual video data and the audio transcript simultaneously. By combining these data streams, the system could determine the intent behind a movement based on what the speaker was saying at that exact moment.
Classifying the Gestures
The AI analysis allowed the researchers to sort hand movements into distinct categories. The first category was “illustrators.” These are gestures that visually represent the object or concept being discussed. For example, a speaker might form a circle with their hands while saying “a round table” or move their hand upward to mimic a rising trend.
The second category was “highlighters.” These movements emphasize speech or point to objects but do not visually depict the content. An example would be a speaker pounding the air to stress a point or pointing a finger to draw attention to a screen.
The third category included “unrelated movements.” These are actions that have no communicative goal, such as scratching an itch, adjusting glasses, or fixing clothing. The final category was simply “no movement,” where the speaker stood still.
Results from the Field
The analysis of the TED Talks yielded clear patterns. The researchers compared the level of hand movement to the number of “likes” each video received on YouTube. They controlled for numerous variables, including the speaker’s gender, the topic of the talk, the length of the video, and even the speaker’s facial expressions.
The data showed a positive link between the amount of hand movement and the audience’s reception. Talks with more hand movement generally received more likes. However, when the researchers broke this down by gesture type, a more specific story emerged.
Highlighters and unrelated movements showed no significant statistical link to positive evaluations. The positive effect was driven almost entirely by illustrators. When speakers used gestures that visually depicted their words, the audience response improved.
Isolating the Cause
While the field data established a correlation, the researchers needed to prove that the gestures caused the improved perception. To do this, they designed a series of controlled experiments.
In one experiment, participants watched a video of an entrepreneur pitching a new skincare product. The speaker was a trained research assistant. Across different versions of the video, the speaker kept their facial expressions, vocal tone, and script identical. The only variable that changed was their hand gestures.
In one condition, the speaker used illustrators, such as making a circular motion on their face while saying “spread it on your face.” In other conditions, they used highlighters (pointing to the face), unrelated movements, or no movement at all.
The Chain of Persuasion
The experimental results confirmed the findings from the TED Talk analysis. Participants who watched the speaker use illustrators reported a higher interest in purchasing the product. They also rated the speaker more favorably compared to the other conditions.
The researchers then analyzed the data to understand the psychological process behind this result. They found a specific chain of events occurred in the minds of the audience. First, the use of illustrators made the information easier to understand. The visual aid acted as a second channel of communication that reinforced the verbal message.
This increased clarity triggered the next step in the process. Because the speaker made the content easy to grasp, the audience perceived the speaker as more competent. It signaled that the speaker had a mastery of the subject matter. Finally, this perception of competence led directly to increased persuasion. The audience was more likely to be convinced by someone they viewed as highly capable.
Complexity and Context
The researchers conducted further analysis to see when these gestures were most effective. They found that the benefits of illustrators were not uniform across all situations. The positive impact was most pronounced when the language used by the speaker was complex.
When a speaker explained difficult concepts or used sophisticated vocabulary, the visual aid of an illustrator became highly valuable. It bridged the gap between the speaker’s words and the audience’s understanding. Conversely, when the language was simple and the concepts were already easy to grasp, the addition of illustrative gestures provided less marginal benefit.
Implications for Business
This study offers practical applications for professionals in various fields. The primary takeaway is that hand gestures are a tool that can be optimized. Salespeople and leaders can consciously incorporate illustrators into their communication style. This does not mean waving hands randomly, which the study found to be ineffective. Instead, speakers should aim to visualize their key points physically.
For example, if a manager is describing a timeline, they might trace a line from left to right. If an entrepreneur is discussing the growth of a market, they might use their hands to show the size expanding. These specific movements help the audience process the information.
The findings also suggest that this is a teachable skill. In the experiments, the speaker was able to adopt these gestures with training, resulting in measurable changes in audience perception. This implies that public speaking coaching should go beyond vocal variety and include “gestural choreography.”
Caveats and Considerations
While the results support the use of illustrators, the researchers note important distinctions. The study found that unrelated movements did not help and could potentially be distracting. Authenticity remains important; gestures that feel forced or do not align with the verbal content may not yield the same results.
Additionally, the research highlights the importance of context. The strategy is most effective when the goal is to explain or persuade regarding complex information. For simple, everyday interactions where understanding is already high, the strategic impact of hand gestures may be lower.
The study also opens doors for the design of artificial intelligence. As companies develop digital avatars and virtual assistants, programming these digital entities to use illustrative hand gestures could make them appear more competent and human-like to users.
![[Adobe Stock]](https://www.psychologyofselling.pro/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/artificial-intelligence-350x250.jpg)
